Since the tragic fire on 3 December 2020, there has been lots of work going on led by our vicar – Jacqueline Stober and the Parochial Church Council (PCC). · It took almost a year to make sure the remaining walls and structure were safe. Scaffolding has been erected in advance of the rebuild. · All the charred artefacts were removed and analysed by archaeologists and other experts to see what could be retrieved and made good again – this work is ongoing. · A fantastic sum of almost £40,000 has been raised by fundraisers and donors to go towards the ‘Rebuilding Our Mission Project’ (ROMP). The PCC is eternally grateful to everybody who has donated – thank you. · The Church rebuild is being paid for by Ecclesiastical Insurance and we have appointed Thomasons (Structural Engineers) as the Project Lead and they are being supported by Buttress Architects. · The equivalent of a planning application seeking formal approval to rebuild our Church is to be considered by the Diocese of Derby on 23 May 2022. The Diocese of Derby is the governing body of Church of England churches in the Derby area. · We are currently into a tendering process to engage an expert builder to hopefully start the rebuilding of the exterior walls and roof before the end of the Summer. · We will be consulting with all residents of the Parish in then next couple of months to seek your views on what you might wish the interior of our Church to look like. The aim being for the Church to be used as a thriving community building for social events and activities, as well as Christian worship. IT WOULD BE GREAT TO RECEIVE YOUR FEEDBACK. · Meanwhile All Saints Church services are being held at St Michaels Church in Kirk Langley every Sunday at 9.30am. Please come along, you will be made very welcome! Hope you find this update helpful. Kindest Regards Bryan Jones 07504827808 bryanjones@bcs.org & Betty Bond 01332 366567 bond552@btinternet.com Church Wardens May 1 2022
Progress The programme dates remain unchanged. Sandberg have reported that they have almost completed all the testing and are hoping to issue their report before the end of next week. Thomasons & Buttress held a productive meeting this week in which we reviewed the reinstatement options for each of the walls in detail. The final decisions will be subject to the findings of the Sandberg report. We are still scheduled to issue the reinstatement strategy report on 17<sup>th</sup> December 2021.Protection to MonumentsBuildzone have progressed with the protection to the remaining monuments. The work was more involved than they originally anticipated and has therefore run into a second week. As we were required to get approval for the extra work, they could not attend this week but they are due back on site on Monday 6<sup>th</sup> December 2021 to complete the work. Please see the above file for photos from Buildzone.Remaining Monument StrategyButtress have liaised with Clara Willets from Historic England with regards to the techniques that may be available for assessing the remaining alabaster monuments (e.g. Ultrasonic scanning). Clara’s feedback was that although it has been used in a number of applications, the results tended to be fairly inconclusive. Therefore, in Clara’s opinion it does not seem to be a suitable technique for assessing the monuments at All Saints.Hirst have also been liaising with experts at Nottingham Trent University who suggest that ultrasonic testing has been superseded by newer technologies. NTU are going to put a document together outlining other methods of analysis that may be appropriate.Meanwhile, Nick Rank from Buttress has had a conversation with David Carrington form Skillingtons with a view to getting a second opinion on the monuments. We are currently awaiting their proposals.Other ItemsWe are awaiting the report from the asbestos survey carried out several weeks ago. We are also awaiting cost proposals form Buildzone for reducing the site welfare accommodation. We are continuing to press Buildzone for each of these.The electrician has confirmed their attendance for 9<sup>th</sup> and 10<sup>th</sup> December 2021 to repower the foul water chamber pump.AnniversaryAs you will be aware, it is exactly one year to the day since the fire that devastated your church. Since then, we have made good progress in clearing the site, retrieving historic artefacts and ensuring that the remaining structure is stable. We are now close to understanding the full extent of the damage that the fire has caused. Although progress has been slower than initially hoped, we are now embarking upon the detailed work involved in designing the new All Saints Church. We hope that this provides grounds for optimism, and we are very much looking forward to working closely with you to deliver the aims of the ROMP.<strong>Gawaine Dawes </strong>BEng (Hons) MSc CEng MIStructE<span style="font-size: 1rem;">Associate</span>
<span style="font-size: 1rem;">Progress</span> Sandberg were on site from the 5<sup>th</sup> to the 8<sup>th</sup> October carrying out the core sampling to the stonework. The coring went as well as could be expected and samples were retrieved from all 22 locations. The quality and condition of the samples varied considerably. Some cores were retrieved intact with very little damage apparent, whilst others were clearly affected by cracking damage and could not be retrieved as a core. In some of the samples, the first 30-40mm of the core was retrieved separately from the main core indicating that the fire had caused a crack at this depth even though the face of the stone may have appeared reasonably intact. We are now awaiting feedback from Sandberg following laboratory testing. We have uploaded a PDF file containing some photographs showing the coring process underway and a selection of cores and core holes.Buttress Architects were also on site on 8<sup>th</sup> October. They carried detailed visual inspections of the <span style="font-size: 1rem;">stonework to help inform the options appraisal due to be presented at the consultation meeting in </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">November.</span>We have instructed Buildzone to provide a new external 110v supply and sump pump to the basement below the vestry. We are awaiting further costs and clarifications regarding repowering the pump to the foul water pumping chamber.Hirst have now provided an updated report and recommendations regarding the remaining fixed monuments and artefacts. Buttress expressed concern at leaving some of the more exposed items unprotected for much longer if there is an intention to restore them. Buttress will forward some comments on this to help to inform any decisions that are made. Gawaine Dawes BEng (Hons) MSc CEng MIStructESenior Structural Engineer
<span style="font-size: 1rem;">Progress</span>A productive review meeting with Buttress Architects covered the programme, potential reinstatement options and consultation with the Diocesan Advisory Committee. Buttress have commissioned the production of rectified photographic images to assist them in carrying out a detailed survey of the stonework. These images are due to be issued by mid-September which will allow Buttress to commence their site survey work. Buttress are also currently working on:<ul><li>assessing the profiles of the timber roof structure to the nave and chancel</li><li>solutions to incorporate insulation to the new roofs to meet current standards and</li><li>assessing the stone profiles of the nave columns using photographic records. </li></ul>Buttress will carry out an options appraisal exercise which we intend to present to the PCC, DAC and other stakeholders. This process will take approx. 4-6 weeks to complete from receipt of the rectified photography images. Sandberg have carried out their initial site visit and have now also been commissioned to do the sampling of the stonework. This was provisionally booked for the end of September but has been delayed until the start of October due to a positive COVID test within the Sandberg site team. This means that we will not have the full Sandberg report back before the consultation meeting. We do however hope to have some interim feedback from the sampling exercise which will assist us in the options appraisal. We appreciate that the timescales are frustrating but we are finding that current circumstances are creating a challenging environment across the construction sector. This is notably having an impact on the cost and availability of materials and lead times for goods and services.Aisle RoofsGiven the feedback we have received from the Chancellor and Historic England and the ongoing survey work, we recommend deferring the aisle roof works at this time. Whilst it would have been good to make a positive start on the rebuilding work, doing so now will introduce unnecessary risk and complication to the approval and reinstatement process. Additionally, as the temporary restraint scaffolds to the north and south aisles have been purchased outright, the cost implication of deferring this work until the main restoration work is insignificant. By rolling the aisle roof works up within the main reinstatement works we will avoid having to submit two separate schemes to the DAC and avoid two separate tender processes. HirstWe have now received feedback from Hirst who have reported that they cannot comment on the restoration potential of the remaining monuments and artefacts without further investigations. We have outlined the position of the PCC to them, explaining that we do not want to commit significant funds to carrying out further investigations and providing protective enclosures to items which may ultimately not be suitable for restoration. We have asked them to provide proposals to this effect and we await their response.Wessex Wessex attended site on Monday 6<sup>th</sup> September to carry out their further processing. The general impression is that there are very few items that are likely to be suitable for long term retention but there is a lot of material that could inform the restoration works depending upon the scope of the project. Many of these items will be related to the Phase 3 fit out works therefore consideration should be given to progressing this phase to establish the scope of the material that ought to be retained. We await Wessex’s updated report but have attached the email update from the team conducting the processing in the interim.Removal of Boiler and PlantWhilst things are relatively quiet on site at the moment, this may be an opportunity to consider removing the existing heating system and other M&E services that remain on site. If there is a consensus that the oil-fired system will not be reinstated, we could also include the removal of the oil tank and pipe to eliminate the residual risks associated with this. If this is something that you wish us to look into please let us know and we will make enquires and put a proposal together.Display BoardsWe are working in conjunction with Buttress to produce ‘story’ boards to display on the site fencing to help maintain public engagement with the project and future proposals. We intend to produce more of these as the restoration work progresses. We hope to have something to share with you on this front very soon.Finally, during the site meeting with Historic England, some ornate carving was identified to the stone threshold between the chancel and the vestry where the organ chamber used to be located. This possibly marks the location of burial within the church, although its location appears to be above a wall. Gawaine Dawes BEng (Hons) MSc CEng MIStructESenior Structural Engineer
